So I did some research online
and followed the recommendations for detracting sparrows and attracting other
birds. I replaced one of the feeders with one specific for finches. I changed
the kind of seed I used on my general feeder. Around my pretty gazebo feeder, I
placed a halo made with wire hangers—strung with fishing line and weights (this
is supposed to discourage sparrows but not other birds for some reason). I made
a fence around the trough so the sparrows couldn’t sweep the food down with
their beaks. My once pretty birdfeeder now resembles an inner city convenience
store with bars, chains, barbed wire, and locks on everything. As of today, the
sparrow gangs are still patrolling the feeders. The juveniles are the worst
offenders. They have no fear. They don’t have enough common sense to know that
their wings can get caught in the fishing line, or that their escape route is
compromised by the wire halo. I have seen a few finches, but they are still
scared to even visit their own feeder, since the sparrows are only a few feet
away. I saw a grosbeak and a cardinal today...which gives me hope. I SHALL keep
fighting for the underserved, for the marginalized, for the gang victims.
In case you’re wondering…Yes, there
is a point to this tongue-in-cheek narrative about my birdfeeders. We start
many service projects with good intentions. We want to help the poor, feed the
hungry, and care for the weak and oppressed. We spend a lot of time and energy
trying to ensure fair and equitable distribution. Yet there are always groups
that abuse our generosity by milking the system and hogging all the resources.
This leads us to feel disgusted, discouraged, and burnt out. We feel like we
are merely wasting our time and money just encouraging the trouble-makers and
bullies.
Most of us would prefer
donating money to refugees and then not worry about whether we are
inadvertently funding the warlords in the process. However, this kind of
irresponsible generosity can cause more harm than good. I think a certain level
of creative strategizing and critical thinking is required, even in charitable
pursuits. In order to resolve societal problems, we must stay
observant—identifying the conflicts and scrutinizing the weaknesses in our
charitable ventures. We must adapt our techniques as we respond to the
complexities that are bound to pop up. We must stay engaged, develop solutions,
and outwit the bullies and gangsters.
In my narrow experience I have found that personal involvement is where I am least subjected to 'scandal' when helping the marginalized. It still happens, equipment still get stolen when crossing the border despite a 'personal delivery' to the shipping company... if you know where I'm going.;-0 however, the chances seem to be less and perhaps I can hold others accountable if I am more involved in a small, relational way with them, and they can also hold me accountable. Your statement of being 'engaged' is right on but much riskier and most of us find it simpler to remain disengaged.
ReplyDeleteSueZq, you are right about personal involvement being the best option. For example, teaching someone a trade or skill, might be less subject to abuse and corruption than contributions of cash or supplies.
ReplyDelete