I
grew up in an environment with a lot of restrictions, but very few boundaries. My
childhood was filled with a lot of rules and regulations. I dressed, smiled,
ate, prayed and acted according to other people’s standards. There was very little
freedom to express myself or think for myself. Yet I was exposed and vulnerable
to invasion. The intruders could come in, but I couldn’t get out. It was much
like a prison, where those in power imposed restrictions, but the weaker
prisoners had very little choice over what happened to them.
As
an adult, I have more power. Even then, boundaries are difficult to establish
and enforce. I’m often tempted to take the path of least resistance—to abandon
my personal boundaries—so as to appease others. I justify it as the Christian
thing to do—following the biblical instructions to turn the other cheek, walk
the extra mile, and give up your coat to the oppressor. (Matt. 5:38-42)
Yet, I have
found that those who capitulate to oppression get violated over and over.
Martin
Luther King discussed three different ways that the oppressed usually deal with
oppressors: Violence, Resignation, or Non-Cooperation. I found what he said
about the trap of capitulation particularly insightful:
“Another way is to acquiesce and to give
in, to resign yourself to the oppression. Some people do that. They discover
the difficulties of the wilderness moving into the promised land, and they
would rather go back to the despots of Egypt because it’s difficult to get in
the promised land. And so they resign themselves to the fate of oppression;
they somehow acquiesce to this thing. But that too isn’t the way because
non-cooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with
good.” (from the sermon, “Loving Your Enemies” by Martin Luther King)
No comments:
Post a Comment